Twitter | YouTube | Facebook | iTunes High-Def | Car Transport | Internet AutoGuide | Car Insurance
Driving Sports TV - Season 1

Exclusive Automotive Videos and Reviews

The way a big car oughta be: 2009 Chrysler 300C SRT8

Editor's Rating:

Specs: 425 horsepower, 420 pound-feet of torque, 6.1-liter hemi V8, 5-speed automatic, all mod cons
Price: $43,860 - $48,520
Good Points Performance is fantastic
Bad Points Fuel economy is tragic

I have a simple prescription to save Chrysler: Get rid of everything that isn’t SRT.

For those who haven’t paid much attention to Chrysler in the last few years, SRT stands for Street and Racing Technology, and it’s the semi-independent high performance division of Chrysler.  SRT functions like MAZDASPEED for Mazda, STI for Subaru, Ralliart for Mitsubishi, and so on.  They take standard Dodge, Chrysler, and Jeep models and gift them with better performance, sexy interiors, and better looks.

SRT is responsible for the Dodge Viper ¬– a car that is completely devoted to performance. And they are also responsible for the Challenger SRT8, with its 6-speed manual transmission and classic Mopar muscle characteristics mated with excellent handling.  They created the ACR and SRT4 versions of the Dodge Neon, which dominated in SCCA Club Racing and Autocross in the 1990s. They’re good, and when you drive an SRT machine, you get a whole different picture of Chrysler than you read in the newspapers.

So just a week after getting the Dodge Challenger SRT8, I received the Chrysler 300C SRT8 to review. The 300 is what I call the Dick Tracy car – for those who never saw that classic comic, the cars were all low, heavy-looking, and drawn with lots of horizontal lines – like a 300. This is a seriously mean-looking large sedan.

Strangely, the Chrysler 300 was also the American car I saw most often while traveling through Italy last summer! It was like a bear surrounded by Chihuahuas among the little
Fiats and Smart cars, but I saw about 20 of them in two weeks over there.

I’ve been in a 300 before, and it was nice enough for a big sedan. And so I wondered what the SRT people could do with it. And the answer left me whomperjawed. If they offered me the keys and title to a Challenger or a 300, I’d take the 300 every time.

Far from being a big heavy wallowing old geezer car, the 300 is solid but has the power to move, it’s comfortable but has the suspension to handle well, it’s large but done right for an excellent driving experience. Usually I’d say that an automatic transmission is the kiss of death, but Chrysler has tightened up the operation of the 300’s tranny to where shifting it yourself would just slow you down.

The same 6.1-liter hemi that powers the Challenger is also found in the 300, backed with a 5-speed automatic transmission with shift capability. That engine is good for 425 horsepower and 420 pound-feet of torque, yielding fuel economy of 13/19 and 15 in combination driving. So, it’s got big hurt potential if gas prices hit the sky again, but if you need to haul a lot of people in a big sedan, this is definitely the one you want.

Inside, the 300C is really nice. It’s comfortable, firm, well laid out, and it has all the bells and whistles you want. Nav, power everything, leather heated everything, nice stereo - all of it.

Of course, the thing about SRT is that it doesn’t come cheap. As tested and fully tricked out, the 300C SRT8 comes to a princely $48,520 against a base price of $43,860. But if you’re shopping rides like the Cadillac STS-V or the BMW 7-Series, the Chrysler number looks positively economical compared to the $70,000+ on those rides.

The bottom line on the 300C SRT8 is that if you’re looking for a Chrysler, you owe it to yourself to drive the SRT version first. I’m betting that you’ll see the best of what Chrysler can do, and it’ll change your impression of Mopar.


Tagged as: , , , , , ,

Rate Post:
First GearSecond GearThird GearFouth GearFifth Gear
Loading ... Loading ...
Share it:

1 Responses »

  1. The 300 is what I call the Dick Tracy car.The 300C is really nice.

Leave a Response